On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 16:42 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Al, linux-fsdevel for fdget/fdput usage]
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The current VFIO_DEVICE_RESET interface only maps to PCI use cases
> > where we can isolate the reset to the individual PCI function. This
> > means the device must support FLR (PCIe or AF), PM reset on D3hot->D0
> > transition, device specific reset, or be a singleton device on a bus
> > for a secondary bus reset. FLR does not have widespread support,
> > PM reset is not very reliable, and bus topology is dictated by the
> > system and device design. We need to provide a means for a user to
> > induce a bus reset in cases where the existing mechanisms are not
> > available or not reliable.
> >
> > This device specific extension to VFIO provides the user with this
> > ability. Two new ioctls are introduced:
> > - VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_GET_HOT_RESET_INFO
> > - VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET
> >
> > The first provides the user with information about the extent of
> > devices affected by a hot reset. This is essentially a list of
> > devices and the IOMMU groups they belong to. The user may then
> > initiate a hot reset by calling the second ioctl. We must be
> > careful that the user has ownership of all the affected devices
> > found via the first ioctl, so the second ioctl takes a list of file
> > descriptors for the VFIO groups affected by the reset. Each group
> > must have IOMMU protection established for the ioctl to succeed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > This patch is dependent on v5 "pci: bus and slot reset interfaces" as
> > well as "pci: Add probe functions for bus and slot reset".
> >
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > index cef6002..eb69bf3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -227,6 +227,97 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_irq_count(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int irq_type)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vfio_pci_count_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + (*(int *)data)++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct vfio_pci_fill_info {
> > + int max;
> > + int cur;
> > + struct vfio_pci_dependent_device *devices;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int vfio_pci_fill_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct vfio_pci_fill_info *info = data;
> > + struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> > +
> > + if (info->cur == info->max)
> > + return -EAGAIN; /* Something changed, try again */
> > +
> > + iommu_group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (!iommu_group)
> > + return -EPERM; /* Cannot reset non-isolated devices */
> > +
> > + info->devices[info->cur].group_id = iommu_group_id(iommu_group);
> > + info->devices[info->cur].segment = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> > + info->devices[info->cur].bus = pdev->bus->number;
> > + info->devices[info->cur].devfn = pdev->devfn;
> > + info->cur++;
> > + iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct vfio_pci_group {
> > + struct vfio_group *group;
> > + int id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct vfio_pci_group_info {
> > + int count;
> > + struct vfio_pci_group *groups;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int vfio_pci_validate_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct vfio_pci_group_info *info = data;
> > + struct iommu_group *group;
> > + int id, i;
> > +
> > + group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (!group)
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + id = iommu_group_id(group);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < info->count; i++)
> > + if (info->groups[i].id == id)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + iommu_group_put(group);
> > +
> > + return (i == info->count) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > + int (*fn)(struct pci_dev *,
> > + void *data), void *data,
> > + bool slot)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *tmp;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &pdev->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + if (slot && tmp->slot != pdev->slot)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + ret = fn(tmp, data);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (tmp->subordinate) {
> > + ret = vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(tmp, fn,
> > + data, false);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus() isn't really vfio-specific, is it?
It's not, I originally has callbacks split out as PCI patches but I was
able to simplify some things in the code by customizing it to my usage,
so I left it here.
> I mean, traversing the PCI hierarchy doesn't require vfio knowledge. I
> think this loop (walking the bus->devices list) skips devices on
> "virtual buses" that may be added for SR-IOV. I'm not sure that
> pci_walk_bus() handles that correctly either, but at least if you used
> that, we could fix the problem in one place.
I didn't know about pci_walk_bus(), I'll look into switching to it.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
