On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Milosz Tanski wrote: > Sage, > > Great. Is there some automated testing system that looks for > regressions in cephfs that I can be watching for? Yep, you can join the ceph-qa@xxxxxxxx email list and watch for the kcephfs suite results (see http://ceph.com/resources/mailing-list-irc/). BTW I made a few tweaks to the second patch due to a conflict (added handling for the length arg to invalidatepage). Thanks! sage > > - Milosz > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Milosz, > > > > I pulled both these into the testing branch. Thanks! > > > > sage > > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Milosz Tanski wrote: > > > >> Currently ceph_invalidatepage has is overly eger with it's checks which are > >> moot. The second change cleans up the case where offset is non zero. > >> > >> Please pull the from: > >> https://bitbucket.org/adfin/linux-fs.git wip-invalidatepage > >> > >> This simple patchset came from the changes I made while working on fscache > >> support for cephfs. Per Sage's request I split this up into smaller bites for > >> testing and review. > >> > >> Milosz Tanski (2): > >> ceph: Remove bogus check in invalidatepage > >> ceph: cleanup the logic in ceph_invalidatepage > >> > >> fs/ceph/addr.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 1.8.1.2 > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> > >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
