Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:42:58PM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
> >list.
> >
> >It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
> >for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
> >patch was dropped.
> >
> >Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
> >message every single time.
> >
> >regards,
> >dan carpenter
> >
> hi, dan carpenter.
> 
> i am not a member of Ocfs2-devel mailing list, after i send this patch,
> it notice me "Your message to Ocfs2-devel awaits moderator approval".
> i subscribe this mailing list just now, do you think i need to resend
> this patch to Ocfs2-devel ?
> 
> thx very much.

No.  You don't need to subscribe or resend.  Your original patch
will be approved and go through after a small delay.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux