Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dong,

On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote:

> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
>> list.
>>
>> It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
>> for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
>> patch was dropped.
>>
>> Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
>> message every single time.
>>
>> regards,
>> dan carpenter
>>
> sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel,
> but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me

It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx only, as this
is a specific patch for OCFS2.

Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2".

Thanks,
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux