On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:03:09PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Do you see any problems with just giving nilfs ->drop_inode() instance
> like this:
> int nilfs2_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> if (unlikely(inode->i_ino == NILFS_ROOT_INO))
> return true;
> return generic_drop_inode(inode);
> }
> Then nilfs_root will live exactly until we unmount the damn thing, giving us
... except that it won't be enough ;-/ Nothing to kick dentries out
on such ummount of a secondary. Oh, well... I still doubt that
have_submounts() makes any sense there, but...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
