Re: [PATCHv4 27/39] x86-64, mm: proper alignment mappings with hugepages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 06:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline unsigned long mapping_align_mask(struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > +	if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
> > +		return PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
> > +	return get_align_mask();
> > +}
> 
> get_align_mask() appears to be a bit more complicated to me than just a
> plain old mask.  Are you sure you don't need to pick up any of its
> behavior for the mapping_can_have_hugepages() case?

get_align_mask() never returns more strict mask then we do in
mapping_can_have_hugepages() case.

I can modify it this way:

        unsigned long mask = get_align_mask();

        if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
                mask &= PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
        return mask;

But it looks more confusing for me. What do you think?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux