Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: reorganize the f2fs_setattr() function.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> Sorry for late. I was very busy.
>
> Could you tell me if it happens difference between xattr and i_mode,
> what will you do?
First of all, I want to know which case make mismatching permission
between xattr and i_mode.
And when we call chmod, inode is locked in sys_chmod. If so,
inode->i_mode can be changed by any updated inode during chmod
although inode is locked ?

> The purpose of i_acl_mode is used to update i_mode and xattr together in
> same lock region.
Could you please tell me what is same lock region ? (inode->i_mutex or
mutex_lock_op(sbi))

Thanks.
>
>>
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Subject: [PATCH v2] f2fs: reorganize the f2fs_setattr(), f2fs_set_acl,
>> > f2fs_setxattr()
>> > From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux