Re: Immutable biovecs, dio rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:20:12PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Please test with XFS and CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y - xfstests will stress
> the dio subsystem a lot more when it is run on XFS. Indeed, xfstests
> generic/013 assert fails almost immediately with:

Thanks - I haven't used xfstests much before. This one turned out to be
an easy fix, but once I turned on CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG I hit something else
I hadn't seen before:

[ 1343.482366] XFS (sdb2): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 1343.482425] XFS (sdb2): bad inode magic/vsn daddr 64 #8 (magic=5858)
[ 1343.482482] XFS: Assertion failed: 0, file: /home/kent/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 417
[ 1343.482558] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1343.482611] kernel BUG at /home/kent/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:108!

This one looks weirder - any thoughts on what might cause _that_?

(Don't spend any time on it, I haven't tried to debug it besides glancing at
the relevant xfs code - just curious if you have any pointers)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux