On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 23:07 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > This is not the first attempt at doing this. The conversion to the > i_lock was originally attempted by Bruce Fields a few years ago. His > approach was NAK'ed since it involved ripping out the deadlock > detection. People also really seem to like /proc/locks for debugging, so > keeping that in is probably worthwhile. Yep, we need to keep this. FWIW, lslocks(8) relies on /proc/locks. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
