Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 06:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > replace_page_cache_page() is only used by FUSE. It's unlikely that we
> > will support THP in FUSE page cache any soon.
> >
> > Let's pospone implemetation of THP handling in replace_page_cache_page()
> > until any will use it.
> ...
> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index 657ce82..3a03426 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -428,6 +428,8 @@ int replace_page_cache_page(struct page *old, struct page *new, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > {
> > int error;
> >
> > + VM_BUG_ON(PageTransHuge(old));
> > + VM_BUG_ON(PageTransHuge(new));
> > VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(old));
> > VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(new));
> > VM_BUG_ON(new->mapping);
>
> The code calling replace_page_cache_page() has a bunch of fallback and
> error returning code. It seems a little bit silly to bring the whole
> machine down when you could just WARN_ONCE() and return an error code
> like fuse already does:
What about:
if (WARN_ONCE(PageTransHuge(old) || PageTransHuge(new),
"%s: unexpected huge page\n", __func__))
return -EINVAL;
?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
