From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
There is no need to initialize few pointers in f2fs_parent_dir
as the values are not checked and instead directly initialized
values are used.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/dir.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
index fc1dacf..b278bfb 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
@@ -215,9 +215,9 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_parent_dir(struct inode *dir, struct page **p)
{
- struct page *page = NULL;
- struct f2fs_dir_entry *de = NULL;
- struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk = NULL;
+ struct page *page;
+ struct f2fs_dir_entry *de;
+ struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk;
page = get_lock_data_page(dir, 0);
if (IS_ERR(page))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
