Re: [PATCH v6 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:14:00PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:13:21PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Initial notes: ==============
> > 
> > Mel, Dave, this is the last round of fixes I have for the
> > series. The fixes are few, and I was mostly interested in
> > getting this out based on an up2date tree so Dave can verify it.
> > This should apply fine ontop of Friday's linux-next.
> > Alternatively, please grab from branch "kmemcg-lru-shrinker" at:
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git
> > 
> > Main changes from *v5: * Rebased to linux-next, and fix the
> > conflicts with the dcache.  * Make sure LRU_RETRY only retry
> > once * Prevent the bcache shrinker to scan the caches when
> > disabled (by returning 0 in the count function) * Fix i915
> > return code when mutex cannot be acquired.  * Only scan
> > less-than-batch objects in memcg scenarios
> 
> Ok, this is behaving a *lot* better than v5 in terms of initial
> balance and sustained behaviour under pure inode/dentry press
> workloads. The previous version was all over the place, not to
> mention unstable and prone to unrealted lockups in the block
> layer.
> 
> However, I'm not sure that the LRUness of reclaim is working
> correctly at this point. When I switch from a write only workload
> to a read-only workload (i.e. fsmark finishes and find starts), I
> see this:
....
> So, yeah, there's still some broken stuff in this patchset that
> needs fixing.  The script that I'm running to trigger these
> problems is pretty basic - it's the same workload I've been using
> for the past 3 years for measuring metadata performance of
> filesystems:

And unmounting an XFS filesystem after running this workload is
hanging from time to time due to a reference counting problem on a
buffer....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux