Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introduce mapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m)
> > +{
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
> > +		return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP
> getting _set_ anywhere.  Am I missing something?

__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux