Re: [PATCH 13/19] f2fs: fix return value of releasepage for node and data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/3/18, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 2013-03-18 (월), 20:39 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
>> 2013/3/18, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > If the return value of releasepage is equal to zero, the page cannot be
>> > reclaimed.
>> > Instead, we should return 1 in order to reclaim clean pages.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  fs/f2fs/data.c |  4 +++-
>> >  fs/f2fs/node.c | 13 +++----------
>> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> > index 6616137..cd6b2cc 100644
>> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> > @@ -680,8 +680,10 @@ static void f2fs_invalidate_data_page(struct page
>> > *page, unsigned long offset)
>> >
>> >  static int f2fs_release_data_page(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
>> >  {
>> > +	if (PageWriteback(page))
>> > +		return 0;
>> >  	ClearPagePrivate(page);
>> > -	return 0;
>> > +	return 1;
>> >  }
>> I have a question.
>> Although PageWriteback is already checked in try_to_release_page,
>> we need to check it again in f2fs_release_data_page ?
>
> Oh, I made a mistake.
> No need to check that.
> Thanks,
You can add
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks :)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux