Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/10, Eric Wong wrote:
> >
> > This fixes the following sparse error when using
> > CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER=y and "make C=2 fs/eventpoll.o"
> >
> > fs/eventpoll.c:514:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
>
> ep_remove_wait_queue() does rcu_dereference(pwq->whead) and
> rcu_dereference_sparse(__rcu) complains, I guess.
>
> > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct eppoll_entry {
> > wait_queue_t wait;
> >
> > /* The wait queue head that linked the "wait" wait queue item */
> > - wait_queue_head_t *whead;
> > + wait_queue_head_t __rcu *whead;
>
> Well, perhaps this change is fine... but otoh this this a bit misleading.
> It is not actually __rcu. The special case is sighand->signalfd_wqh, and
> the commemt in ep_remove_wait_queue() means: if ->whead is not stable then
> we can only race with signalfd_cleanup(), and rcu_read_lock() ensures this
> memory can't go away.
>
> We do not even need smp_read_barrier_depends() here, ACCESS_ONCE() should
> be enough.
>
> Perhaps it would be better to simply shut up this warning somehow...
Hi, I've been hoping others would give a reply and offer a better
solution than min.
Without my proposed patch, sparse _errors_ out on me, so it prevent sparse
from reporting the many other warnings I create in my patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
