Re: [PATCH 00/13] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion (v16)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll post a review tonight or tomorrow.  FWIW, I was not too happy with
> it the last time I looked, but I'll obviously need to reread the whole
> thing.
>
> I *have* looked at unionmount lately, and the recent modifications dhowells
> is doing there are closing most of my problems with that; on the other hand,
> there's no fundamental reason why both can't get merged.  Hell, might as
> well resurrect aufs, while we are at it...

I haven't seen the union mount patchset for a long time.   David, do
you plan to send out the series for review sometime?

> Oh, and the third one - I still owe you a bottle of your choice for sorting
> the atomic_open shite out.  Is there any chance you'll be able to attend
> LSFS this year?

Can't make it this year.  But I do plan to go to KS in Edinburgh.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux