> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ int get_dnode_of_data(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t
> index, int ro)
> alloc_nid_done(sbi, nids[i]);
> mutex_unlock_op(sbi, NODE_NEW);
> done = true;
> - } else if (ro && i == level && level > 1) {
> + } else if (mode == LOOKUP_NODE_RA && i == level && level > 1) {
> npage[i] = get_node_page_ra(parent, offset[i - 1]);
> if (IS_ERR(npage[i])) {
> err = PTR_ERR(npage[i]);
Hi Jaegeuk.
There is no LOOKUP_NODE usage in this patch.
I think that we can use LOOKUP_NODE flag instead of done(bool) like this.
if (mode == LOOKUP_NODE)
Thanks.
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index b235215..6b82e20 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct inode *inode,
> end = start + ADDRS_PER_BLOCK;
>
> set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> - if (get_dnode_of_data(&dn, start, 0))
> + if (get_dnode_of_data(&dn, start, ALLOC_NODE))
> return;
>
> wait_on_page_writeback(dn.node_page);
> --
> 1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
