On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 03:35:26PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 12/02/13 18:03, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> +static int decode_attr_security_label(struct xdr_stream *xdr, uint32_t *bitmap,
> >> > + struct nfs4_label *label)
> >> > +{
> >> > + uint32_t pi = 0;
> >> > + uint32_t lfs = 0;
> >> > + __u32 len;
> >> > + __be32 *p;
> >> > + int status = 0;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (unlikely(bitmap[2] & (FATTR4_WORD2_SECURITY_LABEL - 1U)))
> >> > + return -EIO;
> >> > + if (likely(bitmap[2] & FATTR4_WORD2_SECURITY_LABEL)) {
> >> > + p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 4);
> >> > + if (unlikely(!p))
> >> > + goto out_overflow;
> >> > + lfs = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> >> > + p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 4);
> >> > + if (unlikely(!p))
> >> > + goto out_overflow;
> >> > + pi = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> >> > + p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 4);
> >> > + if (unlikely(!p))
> >> > + goto out_overflow;
> >> > + len = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> >> > + p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len);
> >> > + if (unlikely(!p))
> >> > + goto out_overflow;
> >> > + if (len < XDR_MAX_NETOBJ) {
> >> > + if (label) {
> >> > + nfs4_label_init(label);
> >> > + if (label->len < len) {
> > If I remember the earlier patch right, nfs4_label_init() just set
> > label->len to NFS4_MAXLABELLEN.
> Good good catch... XDR_MAX_NETOBJ should be NFS4_MAXLABELLEN.
>
> >
> > Doesn't that overwrite the length that was passed into
> > nfs4_get_security_label?
> Yes... the len will be set to the actual size of the label which
> will be less than NFS4_MAXLABELLEN. So I'm thinking this overwrite
> of the is fine.
>
> This is the reason nfs4_label_init() resets len to NFS4_MAXLABELLEN
OK, but then
if (label->len < len)
is equivalent to
if (NFS4_MAXLABELLEN < len)
Why are we checking len twice?
You may want to just remove nfs4_label_init() entirely. This is the
only caller, and it doesn't seem very useful.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
