Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
[...]
>> I'd feel a lot better deferring the whole aio/dio performance series for
>> one merge window. There's very little point in rushing it, and I don't
>> think it's been reviewed/tested enough yet.
>
> It could probably use more review, but it has been sitting in linux-next
> and the issues that showed up there are all fixed. You going to help
> review it? :)
>
> I'm not really set on it going in this merge cycle, but testing wise I
> do think it's in pretty good shape and I'm not sure where we're going to
> get more testing from before it goes in.
>
> And Andrew - apologies for not getting you the benchmarks you asked for,
> getting hardware for it has turned out to be more troublesome than I
> expected. Still don't know what's going on with that.

I'll try to get some benchmarking numbers for this patch set.

-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux