Re: [PATCH 1/1] eventfd: implementation of EFD_MASK flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/13 04:54, Eric Wong wrote:

Using one eventfd per userspace socket still seems a bit wasteful.

Wasteful in what sense? Occupying a slot in file descriptor table?
That's the price for having the socket uniquely identified by the
fd.

Yes.  I realize eventfd is small, but I don't think eventfd is needed
at all, here.  Just one pipe.

Ah. Got you! You mean not to change the kernel, just use pipe for the purpose.

However, the convoluted pipe-style design is the problem I am trying to solve rather than the solution. It leads to convoluted APIs with convoluted semantics as described in the article. I've been using that kind of design for past 8 years and every time I have to deal with it I swear that one day I will implement a proper in-kernel solution to get rid of the hack.

And now I have finally done so.

Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux