Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Thin provisioning SOFT_THRESHOLD error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/29/2013 10:14 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Thin-provisioned devices have the ability to set a 'soft threshold', 
> which is triggered if the real free space for this device is beyond 
> this mark.
> 
> The intention behind this is to allow the system to induce some 
> garbage collection with possibly freeing up unused space.
> 
> Initially it would be possible to execute garbage collection on 
> filesystems (eg for btrfs).
> 
> However, as this concept applies to other areas within the kernel
> (like dm-thinp or even btrfs itself) it might be an idea to have
> a general mechanism / error handling etc in place.
> 
> I would like to discuss at LSF the possible implementations
> and handling mechanism for this kind of failure scenarios.
> 

Hannes hi!

This is received as an "unit attentions", right?
Will it not be worth while to solve the general "unit attentions"
under udev events, once and for all. Than such a btrfs GC above
can just be a simple oneline udev rule.

(I think that the event-storm problem you had at the time can
 be solved with some Kernel side "unit attentions" queue, and
 greatly reduce the chance for missed events)

Thanks
Boaz

> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux