Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think the problem is that directory offsets are not consistent > >> between readdir and readdirplus. The solution is that userspace > >> should always use the same offsets. This makes the readdirplus > >> implementation more complex but that's really the only sane thing to > >> do. > > > > I think something like the following is necessary in the kernel, too. > > (Userspace patch coming) > > Can you please explain what this patch is trying to do? Because I > think it's not doing what it wants ;) I admit I'm not sure why your original email only said: userspace should always use the same offsets instead of: kernel and userspace should always use the same offsets This patch makes the kernel always use the same offsets, as does v2 of my high-level userspace patch. Anyways, I've tested this patch together with my v2 userspace patch and got the results I expected with adaptive readdirplus. Perhaps I have two bugs nullifying each other? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
