2013/2/4, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > 2013-02-02 (토), 23:51 +0900, Namjae Jeon: >> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> We can remove the call to find_get_page to get a page from the cache >> and check for up-to-date, instead we can make use of grab_cache_page >> part itself to fetch the page from the cache. >> So, removing the call and moving the PageUptodate at proper place, also >> taken care of moving the lock_page condition in the page_hit part. >> >> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/f2fs/node.c | 10 ++++------ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c >> index 33fa6d5..723185b 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c >> @@ -920,15 +920,12 @@ struct page *get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent, >> int start) >> if (!nid) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); >> >> - page = find_get_page(mapping, nid); >> - if (page && PageUptodate(page)) >> - goto page_hit; >> - f2fs_put_page(page, 0); >> - > > The reason why we use this is to avoid the lock overhead. > This is a readahead flow, and we don't need to care about real > existence. Let's get and check the status of the page without any locks. > Thanks, Yes, Agreed. I will chceck more about this. Thanks a lot! > > -- > Jaegeuk Kim > Samsung > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html