The "head removal" branch in the condition is never used in any code
path in ext4 since the function only caller ext4_ext_rm_leaf() will make
sure that the extent is properly split before removing blocks. Note that
there is a bug in this branch anyway.
This commit removes the unused code completely and makes use of
ext4_error() instead of printk if dubious range is provided.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 21 ++++-----------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 7b44dc1..966a09e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2414,23 +2414,10 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
*partial_cluster = EXT4_B2C(sbi, pblk);
else
*partial_cluster = 0;
- } else if (from == le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block)
- && to <= le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) + ee_len - 1) {
- /* head removal */
- ext4_lblk_t num;
- ext4_fsblk_t start;
-
- num = to - from;
- start = ext4_ext_pblock(ex);
-
- ext_debug("free first %u blocks starting %llu\n", num, start);
- ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, start, num, flags);
-
- } else {
- printk(KERN_INFO "strange request: removal(2) "
- "%u-%u from %u:%u\n",
- from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
- }
+ } else
+ ext4_error(sbi->s_sb, "strange request: removal(2) "
+ "%u-%u from %u:%u\n",
+ from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
