From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
We can directly return '0' from the function, instead of introducing a
'ret' variable.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 86f8549..39ba11a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
- int ret = 0;
if (!sbi->s_dirty && !get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES))
return 0;
@@ -127,7 +126,7 @@ int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
if (sync)
write_checkpoint(sbi, false, false);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
