Op 04-12-12 11:33, Maarten Lankhorst schreef: > Hey, > > Op 29-11-12 21:06, Al Viro schreef: >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:29:58AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>>> Could you try the following patch? This should report what directories >>>>> cannot be renamed because one of them is a mount point and it gives some >>>>> real insight into what is going on. >>>> ls / >>>> __d_unalias: /dev -> /dev >>>> __d_unalias: /proc -> /proc >>>> __d_unalias: /sys -> /sys >>> Ok. That is what I thought was going on. For some reason nfs is >>> attempting to recreate an existing dentry. >>> >>> Does this fix the nfs problem for you? >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c >>> index 8086636..6390f0f 100644 >>> --- a/fs/dcache.c >>> +++ b/fs/dcache.c >>> @@ -2404,6 +2404,9 @@ out_unalias: >>> if (likely(!d_mountpoint(alias))) { >>> __d_move(alias, dentry); >>> ret = alias; >>> + } else if ((alias->d_parent == dentry->d_parent) && >>> + !dentry_cmp(alias, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len)) >>> + ret = alias; >>> } >> The interesting question is why the hell had it decided that preexisting >> dentry was not good enough for it? Note that we have arrived to nfs_lookup() >> after we'd decided *not* to use the damn alias. The trace posted upthread >> went __lookup_hash() -> lookup_real(). It means that lookup_dcache() >> has not produced this one. And no, even if ->d_revalidate() decided it >> was no good, the logics in d_invalidate() would've said "busy" and we'd >> gone with that dentry anyway. So it means that d_lookup() has not >> found it at all. >> >> IOW, something out there is blindly unhashing mountpoint dentries; that's >> where the real root of the problem seems to be. Could you slap >> WARN_ON(d_mountpoint(dentry)) in __d_drop() and see what it catches? >> > Sorry for replying so late, I thought I wasn't hitting the bug any more, I was wrong.. > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: at fs/dcache.c:452 d_drop+0x58/0x60() > Hardware name: Aspire M3985 > Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq kvm_intel kvm snd_timer snd_seq_device radeon snd usb_storage parport_pc ttm soundcore drm_kms_helper snd_page_alloc ppdev drm parport mei agpgart netconsole configfs nfsd > Pid: 1497, comm: ls Not tainted 3.7.0-rc4-patser+ #517 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8104cd8f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8104cdea>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff81187be8>] d_drop+0x58/0x60 > [<ffffffff81256881>] nfs_readdir_page_filler+0x271/0x460 > [<ffffffff81257e59>] nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array+0x1f9/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff81257f66>] nfs_readdir_filler+0x26/0x90 > [<ffffffff81119e15>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x35/0x50 > [<ffffffff8111a622>] do_read_cache_page+0x82/0x1a0 > [<ffffffff81257f40>] ? nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array+0x2e0/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff81183d40>] ? sys_ioctl+0xb0/0xb0 > [<ffffffff8111a78c>] read_cache_page_async+0x1c/0x20 > [<ffffffff8111a79e>] read_cache_page+0xe/0x20 > [<ffffffff81258327>] nfs_readdir+0x137/0x510 > [<ffffffff811840e1>] ? vfs_readdir+0x81/0xf0 > [<ffffffff8126dfe0>] ? nfs3_xdr_dec_getattr3res+0x80/0x80 > [<ffffffff81183d40>] ? sys_ioctl+0xb0/0xb0 > [<ffffffff81184118>] vfs_readdir+0xb8/0xf0 > [<ffffffff8118426e>] sys_getdents+0x8e/0x120 > [<ffffffff81753394>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 > ---[ end trace 61d6a607ecd4e587 ]--- > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > Using addr2line, it is indeed nfs_prime_dcache dropping the entry, in the !nfs_same_file case. ~Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html