On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:40:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > So it was based on this interface? Based on that. I had dropped the inode operation as it's not really a generic operation but a callback for either the buffered I/O code or direct I/O and should be treated as such. I've also split the single multiplexer function into individual ones, but the underlying data structure and fundamental operations are the same. > (I went looking for this code on google a couple of days ago so I > could point at it and say "we should be using an iomap structure, > not buffer heads", but it looks like I never posted it to fsdevel or > the xfs lists...) Your version defintively was up on your kernel.org XFS tree, that's what I started from. I'll have a long plane right tonight, let's see if I can get the direct I/O version updated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
