From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> When performing an exec where the binary lives in one user namespace and the execing process lives in another usre namespace there is the possibility that the target uids can not be represented. Instead of failing the exec simply ignore the suid/sgid bits and run the binary with lower privileges. We already do this in the case of MNT_NOSUID so this should be a well tested code path. As the user and group are not changed this should not introduce any security issues. Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/exec.c | 9 +++------ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 0039055..aef0c2f 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1266,14 +1266,13 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) bprm->cred->egid = current_egid(); if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) && - !current->no_new_privs) { + !current->no_new_privs && + kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid) && + kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) { /* Set-uid? */ if (mode & S_ISUID) { - if (!kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid)) - return -EPERM; bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID; bprm->cred->euid = inode->i_uid; - } /* Set-gid? */ @@ -1283,8 +1282,6 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) * executable. */ if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) { - if (!kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) - return -EPERM; bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID; bprm->cred->egid = inode->i_gid; } -- 1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html