On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:50 AM, P J P <ppandit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > +-- On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Kees Cook wrote --+ > | > Al, what's your take on the *rare* extra call to request_module? > | > | Without any other feedback, I'd like to use my minimal allocation > | patch, since it fixes the problem and doesn't change any of the > | semantics of how/when loading happens. > > I did apply and test this patch with kernel-3.5.3 on my machine. Now it > seems to disclose dynamically allocated(kstrdup) bytes, instead of the call > stack bytes. Recursions still dodge and exceed the limit of > BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION(4). > > Please pardon my asking, but - how is this a fix? Hrm? It should be showing only the live heap-allocated interp -- are you seeing uninitialized contents? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
