[PATCH 3/3] fat: remove unneeded compare condition for __fat_write_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In calling of __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL),
expression "wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL" will always be equivalent to value
of wbc->sync_mode. So, remove this additional compare condition from function
arguments.

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/fat/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c
index 7b186a5..aa0138b 100644
--- a/fs/fat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fat/inode.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static int fat_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 		err = fat_clusters_flush(sb);
 		mutex_unlock(&MSDOS_SB(sb)->s_lock);
 	} else
-		err = __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
+		err = __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode);
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux