On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Umm... After looking at what POSIX actually says... There is an issue,
> all right. Thanks for spotting. Fix follows:
>
> Return the right error value when dup2() or dup3() newfd argument is too large
I don't think this fixes anything.
You're fixing replace_fd(), but dup2/dup3 don't actually *use* that.
They have their own RLIMIT_NOFILE check and return -EMFILE there.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
