On 10/06/2012 03:38 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Removed lock/unlock super.
>
Hi Marco
I was sure you guys where pushing this patch through some
vfs tree. (Hence my Acked-by below). I have just sent Linus
a pull request for the 3.7 Kernel. I could perhaps append this
one and resend.
I do want this patch, and it is completely independent and can
go through my tree. Please tell me what do you want to do with
this patch, should I push it? Or are you pushing it through Al
Thanks
Boaz
> Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/exofs/super.c | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/super.c b/fs/exofs/super.c
> index 59e3bbf..5e59280 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/super.c
> @@ -389,8 +389,6 @@ static int exofs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> if (unlikely(ret))
> goto out;
>
> - lock_super(sb);
> -
> ios->length = offsetof(struct exofs_fscb, s_dev_table_oid);
> memset(fscb, 0, ios->length);
> fscb->s_nextid = cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_nextid);
> @@ -406,8 +404,6 @@ static int exofs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> if (unlikely(ret))
> EXOFS_ERR("%s: ore_write failed.\n", __func__);
>
> -
> - unlock_super(sb);
> out:
> EXOFS_DBGMSG("s_nextid=0x%llx ret=%d\n", _LLU(sbi->s_nextid), ret);
> ore_put_io_state(ios);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
