Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: add block-based file punching hole support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:25:39PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > I run xfstests to do some tests, and I got an error from xfstests #
> > 255.  The failure reason is that block-based file in ext4 cannot
> > support fallocate(2) to allocate an unwritten blocks.  I am not sure
> > whether we should change # 255 in xfstests or not.  So Cc' to Dave
> > Chinner to get some feedbacks.
> 
> Zheng,
> 
> I gave these patches a quick try and I'm seeing many more failures
> than just test #255.  Tests 75, 91, 112, 215, and 263 are also
> failing, and I don't think it's all due to punch being supported w/o
> fallocate support.

Hi Ted,

Thanks for sharing this information with me.  I will look at these
patches after patch series of extent status tree gets stable and submit
to the mailing list.

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux