On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:24:26AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Can you let me know what changes you need to make? If it is to add > > new features or new sanity checks, does it make sense to simply make > > it as new commits to existing patch set? Or are there fundamental > > problems with the current set, that would be better to fix in the > > current set of commits? (Or is it just minor stylistic/spelling > > fixes?) > > > > Thanks!! > > In new patch set, there is three changes as beblow: > > 1. add a sanity check in ext4_evict_inode() > 2. fix a bug in ext4_find_delalloc_range(). This bug is reported by > xfstest #230 when we enable bigalloc feature. > 3. Add a new rwlock to protect extent status tree. > > So I think that we can only add a sanity check and fix the bigalloc bug, > and then apply this patch set because the changes are minor. For adding > a new lock to protect extent status tree, we can add this feature in a > new patch. If you think it is OK, I can generate a new patch set, do > some tests using xfstest, and submit it as soon as possible. What's > your opinion? Do you think you can get me the patches by the end of the week? If so, that should work. Thanks!! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
