Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize extent status tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:24:26AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > Can you let me know what changes you need to make?  If it is to add
> > new features or new sanity checks, does it make sense to simply make
> > it as new commits to existing patch set?  Or are there fundamental
> > problems with the current set, that would be better to fix in the
> > current set of commits?  (Or is it just minor stylistic/spelling
> > fixes?)
> > 
> > Thanks!!
> 
> In new patch set, there is three changes as beblow:
> 
> 1. add a sanity check in ext4_evict_inode()
> 2. fix a bug in ext4_find_delalloc_range().  This bug is reported by
> xfstest #230 when we enable bigalloc feature.
> 3. Add a new rwlock to protect extent status tree.
> 
> So I think that we can only add a sanity check and fix the bigalloc bug,
> and then apply this patch set because the changes are minor.  For adding
> a new lock to protect extent status tree, we can add this feature in a
> new patch.  If you think it is OK, I can generate a new patch set, do
> some tests using xfstest, and submit it as soon as possible.  What's
> your opinion?

Do you think you can get me the patches by the end of the week?  If
so, that should work.

Thanks!!

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux