On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:41:26AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Hi Zheng, > > I've applied your patches to the ext4 patch queue, and so they have > shown up in the dev branch of the ext4 git tree. > > One thing I've noticed in my regression tests is that there is a new > test failure with this patch series applied. It is xfstests #230, > when bigalloc is enabled: > > FSTYP -- ext4 > PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 candygram 3.6.0-rc1-00043-ga3229f7 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -q -O bigalloc /dev/vdc > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity /dev/vdc /vdc > > 230 - output mismatch (see 230.out.bad) > --- 230.out 2012-09-19 01:15:44.000000000 -0400 > +++ 230.out.bad 2012-09-20 10:37:05.143728890 -0400 > @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ > ### create files, setting up ownership (type=u) > ### some buffered IO (type=u) > Write 900k... > +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Rewrite 1001k... > +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Write 1000k... > pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Write 4096... > @@ -21,7 +23,9 @@ > ### create files, setting up ownership (type=g) > ### some buffered IO (type=g) > Write 900k... > +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Rewrite 1001k... > +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Write 1000k... > pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded > Write 4096... > Ran: 230 > Failures: 230 > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > I haven't had time to take a look at this, and it's only failing when > bigalloc is enabled. If you could take a look I would greatly > appreciate it. Hi Ted, Sorry for delay reply. I will look at this problem after I finish inline data patch set for e2fsprogs. Thanks for your review. Regards, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
