Hi, I'm wonder why generic get_block_t callback has not fsprivate argument? Each filesystem implement it's own get_block_t callback. Each filesystem call generic functions which use callback from known context, but where is no good way to pass that context to fs_specific_get_block callback. This result in situation where fs-specific data passed via inode's data (xxx_inode->cur_get_block_data) All this means that inode's private pointer becomes implicit serialization point even if get_block() are allowed to be called concurrently. I'm going to add fsprivate argument, number of generic function which use get_block_t is not really huge, so the patch should be too big. If some one has any objections why this shouldn't be done, please welcome. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
