Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: Move kfree outside pde_unload_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/2012 04:42 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 20:28 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

Thats interesting, but if you really want this to fly, one RCU
conversion would be much better ;)

pde_users would be an atomic_t and you would avoid the spinlock
contention.
Here is what I had in mind, I would be interested to know how it helps a 512 core machine ;)

Thanks, I knew if I just took my time and read the rcu documentation
thoroughly that the answer would be forthcoming. ;)

Unfortunately I have to wait till tomorrow to get big box and test it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux