On 08/21/2012 03:29 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: <> > OK. So if you don't mind the fact that there are filesystems with > inotify support but not filehandle support, then I think generating a > filehandle early as you describe would work. I guess it's a little more > memory per watched inode. > For the minority of FSs that do not have a filehandle support it should be easy to generate a generic one, that should work 95% of the time. Are we guaranteed that after the checkpoint restore the version of the Kernel is the same as the one that did the checkpoint? If yes then I don't see any problem. > --b. Cheers Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
