On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 16:15 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > There are some optimizations I can do here, but lets for now just do > the sb->s_lock thing, and I might decide to completely revamp the > all thing later. OK. But I guess an exofs-specific mutex could be used instead. We do not have to depend on 'sb->s_lock'. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
