From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
XXX: I don't understand this code, but I also can't see how it can be
right as is: a dentry marked DCACHE_DISCONNECTED can in fact be a
fully-connected member of the dcache. Is IS_ROOT() the right check
instead?
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/dcache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dcache.c b/fs/ocfs2/dcache.c
index e5ba348..2a66620 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dcache.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static void ocfs2_dentry_iput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
* No dentry lock is ok if we're disconnected or
* unhashed.
*/
- if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED) &&
+ if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) &&
!d_unhashed(dentry)) {
unsigned long long ino = 0ULL;
if (inode)
--
1.7.11.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
