On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:37:58 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()' > > call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them > > once all users are gone. > > Hi Andrew, > > would you please pick this patch-set as well? I also sent you an update > for hfs and hfsplus file-systems today - found a bug while doing some > more testing. Also, I sent UFS changes today, very similar. Most > probably no one will reply and I hope you would pick them as well. > The issue Alan raised around the superblock timestamp is still up in the air. I guess he's a slow typist ;) My take is "no, we don't need to do that any more" - surely all Linux systems have a functional hardware clock. But the changelog should be updated to describe and justify the decision. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
