Hi Jan,
On 2012/07/11 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
By the way, is there anything specific in patch 2
(apart from the conditional locking ugliness) that you want
to me to change? Maybe resolve the conflicts with your patch
set?
I would be happier if you based your patches on my patch set (less work
for me ;). OTOH your patches are simpler so Al might decide to merge them
first. So all in all my opinion doesn't matter much here. It is Al who
decides...
I will rebase against Al's vfs tree. If your patches get merged first
I do not mind resolving the merge conflicts you mentioned.
Ok. Could you get your Acked-by or Reviewed-by for the changes
you agree with?
Please fix the patch 1 and the conditional locking in patch 2 (that will
also require changes to other patches in the series - they might be smaller
if you reorder patches as I suggested). Then I'll check the whole series
and can give you my Reviewed-by.
Ok, I will fix patch 1 and 2 (probably without reordering) and repost.
Thank you again for your comments!
Regards,
Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
