On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:13 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > drity and then setting the s_dirt flag. And when 'write_super()' is executed to > > handle the s_dirt flag, we just update the timestamp and again mark the > > superblock buffer as dirty. Seems pointless. > > It's the way sysv itself does stuff. The timestamp on v7/sys3/sys5 > reflects the clock on the box. A lot of ancient boxes with no decent > hardware clocks used to reset the system time off the root fs superblock > on a loss of power. Oh, OK, thanks for the info. Do you think I need to take more efforts to preserve the behavior? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part