On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:45 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:14:42AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:54:22PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > Can you tell me *which* xfstest this was blocking on? > > > > > > Test 068 which runs fsstress. > > > > Hmmm, I had just started an xfstests -g auto run using standard ext4 > > defaults with 3.5-rc2, and I'm not noting any problems. And I've > > gotten past test 68 w/o any problems. > > I just tried again with 3.5-rc5, and I was able to reproduce your > failure by using "check 68 68 68 68 68" (it failed after the 2nd time > it ran the fsstress test. What's interesting is that there have been > no changes in fs/ext4 or fs/jbd2 since 3.5-rc2. So this may have been > caused by a writeback related change; I'm starting a bisect now. OK, cool, let me know if you need help, I'll be able to help tomorrow. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
