Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] affs: stop setting bm_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 20:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I could not find good documentation describing this field, except of one random
> > piece of documentation in the internet which says that -1 means that the root
> > block is valid, which is not consistent with what we have in the Linux AFFS
> > driver.
> 
> The book "Amiga Intern" (German version on the 'net, which is faster to access
> than the Dutch version somewhere in my attic ;-) agrees with this ("Dieses Flag
> enthält -1 (TRUE), wenn die Bit-Map der Diskette gültig ist").

Thangs Geert for confirming.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux