On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:08:53PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 0d9de41..f408a27 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -538,14 +538,14 @@ xfs_showargs(
> else if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT)
> seq_puts(m, "," MNTOPT_UQUOTANOENF);
>
> - /* Either project or group quotas can be active, not both */
> -
> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD)
> seq_puts(m, "," MNTOPT_PRJQUOTA);
> else
> seq_puts(m, "," MNTOPT_PQUOTANOENF);
> - } else if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) {
> + }
> +
> + if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) {
> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD)
> seq_puts(m, "," MNTOPT_GRPQUOTA);
> else
Why can they co-exist now? XFS does not use the VFS quota
code, and you've made no other changes to XFS so I can't see how you
can make that assertion. There's a current patchset under review
that allows XFS to have co-existing group and project quotas - it's
complex, changes the on-disk format and requires userspace tool
support (e.g. mkfs, repair, xfs_db, etc).
So I can't see how this works with XFS at all...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
