Re: [PATCH V2] hfsplus: Fix bless ioctl when used with hardlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:57:24AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > HFS+ doesn't really implement hard links - instead, hardlinks are indicated
> > by a magic file type which refers to an indirect node in a hidden
> > directory. The spec indicates that stat() should return the inode number
> > of the indirect node, but it turns out that this doesn't satisfy the
> > firmware when it's looking for a bootloader - it wants the catalog ID of
> > the hardlink file instead. Fix up this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > V2 cleans up the casting.
> 
> Did this patch get dropped on the floor?  It's been almost 2 months
> since it was submitted.

It just got missed, sorry.  I'll send it along ASAP.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux