On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:01 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Right. By default it's 90 seconds before we'll give up on the client. So a slightly buggy client can basically DoS the server by getting a delegation and then crashing or something. Everybody else that tries to read that directory (not that file) will be dead in the water. Definitely not good. > I hate that too, and originally tried to avoid it with something like: > > retry: > acquire locks > lookup inode > ret = try_to_break_deleg(inode); > if (ret) > drop locks > really_break_deleg(inode); > goto retry; > ... do the real work ... > drop locks > > I felt like I was making already complicated code logic like rename's > even harder to follow. I do think it's the only thing we can reasonably do. I'd love to have some kind of per-dentry lock for unlink/rename, but we don't. Long-term, we really do need to do something about the directory locking, though, because it's also a huge problem for readdir() concurrency. Or at least it used to be (samba in particular). Making it an rwsem might help readdir a tiny amount, but I suspect people actually depend on the mutex in readdir right now. > And those operations don't really know the inode till they acquire the > locks, so in pathological cases that could continue forever. I suspect at some point you just have to say "screw it". Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html