On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:54:39PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 31-05-12 20:51:11, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 30-05-12 21:50:12, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > > > index 038076b..5584a29 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > > > @@ -861,7 +861,8 @@ static inline int inode_unhashed(struct inode *inode) > > > * 0: the object of the current VFS operation > > > * 1: parent > > > * 2: child/target > > > - * 3: quota file > > > + * 3: xattr > > > + * 4: quota file > > This isn't correct anymore, is it? Just remove references to quota in this > > comment... > Oh, now I've noticed patch 6/6. Maybe this patch and 6/6 should be just > joined into one? Sure.--b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
