Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] Gut bio_add_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:08:15PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > i thought a bit more about it and the only thing which makes sense to
> > me is exposing the stripe granularity for striped devices -
> > ie. something which says "if you go across this boundary, the
> > performance characteristics including latency might get affected",
> > which should fit nicely with the rest of topology information.
> > Martin, adding that shouldn't be difficult, right?
> 
> We already have the optimal IO size/alignment field in the topology.
> Doesn't this fit what you want exactly?

I don't know how xfs/ext4 is currently benefiting from
merge_bvec_fn(), so I'm unsure.  If the existing ones are enough,
great.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux